Sun Belt Solar Guide 2026: California, Texas & Nevada Compared

California, Texas, and Nevada represent three of the four largest solar markets in the United States — and three completely different policy environments. California has the highest solar density but a net metering policy (NEM 3.0) that fundamentally changes how you size your system. Texas is the #2 national market but has no statewide net metering mandate, creating wildly different economics depending on your utility. Nevada went through the most dramatic solar policy reversal in U.S. history — and came back stronger.

If you're evaluating solar in one of these three states — or trying to compare them — this guide gives you the side-by-side picture that individual state guides can't: who has better incentives, which policy environment is more stable, and what each state's buyers actually pay after every incentive is stacked.

Sun Belt Solar: Why These Three States Are Different

The sun-belt states share a common advantage: abundant solar resource. Las Vegas averages 5.8 peak sun hours per day. Phoenix exceeds 6.5. Dallas reaches 5.2. Los Angeles ranges from 5.2 (coastal) to 5.8 (inland valleys). Even the cloudier parts of these states — San Francisco at 4.7, El Paso at 6.0 — outperform most of the Northeast.

But sun hours tell only part of the story. The three decisive variables in any state's solar economics are:

1. Net metering policy — what you're paid for excess power exported to the grid
2. Electricity rate — the baseline cost your solar offsets
3. State and utility incentives — what stacks on top of the 30% federal ITC

On all three variables, California, Texas, and Nevada are dramatically different from each other — and from the Southeast and Mountain West states covered in the other regional hub guides.

3-State Comparison Table (2026)

Metric	California	Texas	Nevada
Peak sun hours/day	4.7–5.8	4.8–5.5	5.3–5.8
Avg. electricity rate	$0.30–$0.40/kWh	$0.12–$0.16/kWh	$0.13–$0.15/kWh
Net metering type	Avoided cost (NEM 3.0)	Utility-by-utility	Retail statutory (AB 405)
State income tax credit	No	No (no income tax)	No
Property tax exemption	Yes (AB 1470 — 100%)	Yes (Sec. 11.27 — 100%)	Yes (NRS 361.079 — full)
Sales tax exemption	No	No	Yes (NRS 374.357 — full)
Standard payback	12–16 years (no battery) / 9–13 years (with battery)	10–14 years (Austin Energy/CPS) / 13–18 years (Oncor)	9–12 years
Best available ITC	30% (40% Energy Community in select inland areas)	30% (40% Energy Community in several Texas counties)	30% (40% Energy Community in select Nevada counties)
Battery storage imperative?	Yes (NEM 3.0 requires battery for best ROI)	Yes (Winter Storm Uri grid reliability)	Optional (strong NEM protects ROI without battery)

Summary verdict: Nevada has the most straightforward solar economics — strong sun, statutory retail NEM, full property and sales tax exemptions. Texas is the largest market but the most fragmented — your specific utility determines whether solar is exceptional or marginal. California has the highest rates (making each kWh more valuable) but NEM 3.0 requires battery storage to approach its potential.

California: The #1 Solar Market — But NEM 3.0 Changed Everything

California installs more residential solar than any other state — historically more than 40% of U.S. totals — driven by some of the highest electricity rates in the country ($0.30–$0.40/kWh for most residential customers in 2026). But the California Public Utilities Commission's April 2023 switch from NEM 2.0 to NEM 3.0 fundamentally changed how California homeowners must approach solar.

California Net Metering: NEM 3.0 vs. NEM 2.0

Under NEM 2.0 (applicable to systems installed before April 15, 2023): Export credits were valued at close to the full retail rate — roughly $0.30–$0.35/kWh depending on your utility (PG&E, SCE, or SDG&E). Oversizing your system made financial sense because every exported kWh earned near-full value.

Under NEM 3.0 (all new applications from April 15, 2023 onward): Export rates ("Avoided Cost Calculator" rates) average $0.03–$0.08/kWh — a 75–90% reduction from NEM 2.0 rates. Your panels still offset what you consume at home at full value, but surplus sent to the grid earns a fraction of retail.

The NEM 3.0 financial impact: A system that exports 30% of its production (common with oversized systems) earns $90–$240/year in export credits under NEM 3.0 vs. $900–$1,050/year under NEM 2.0. This makes a 9-year payback stretch to 14+ years if you just add panels without storage.

The NEM 3.0 solution — battery storage: The CA Public Utilities Commission designed NEM 3.0 to incentivize battery storage. Here's how it changes the math:

Scenario	8 kW System, PG&E Territory
No battery, NEM 3.0	13–16 year payback
With Powerwall, NEM 3.0 (self-consume > 90%)	9–12 year payback
NEM 2.0 grandfathered customer	8–11 year payback

With a battery, you store midday solar production and use it during PG&E's high-rate evening peak (5–9pm when TOU rates reach $0.60+/kWh). This shifts the value of solar from low-rate export to high-rate offset — creating economics that can rival NEM 2.0 despite the lower export rate.

CA NEM 3.0 data check (LBNL, 2026): 87% of California solar installations in 2025 included battery storage, up from 31% pre-NEM 3.0. This confirms the strategy — California buyers without batteries are leaving significant value on the table.

California Incentives Beyond the ITC

Federal 30% ITC: On a typical 8–12 kW California system costing $28,000–$42,000, the ITC delivers $8,400–$12,600 in federal tax savings.

SGIP Battery Rebate: The Self-Generation Incentive Program provides cash rebates for battery storage. Current tiers (2026):

• Equity tier (income-qualified, disadvantaged communities): $0.85–$1.00+/kWh of battery capacity — active, funded
• General residential tier: Currently at waitlist stage in most PG&E and SCE territories — check sgipinfo.com for current availability
• A 13.5 kWh Powerwall qualifies for $11,475–$13,500 in the Equity tier, essentially covering most of the battery cost

DAC-SASH: For income-qualified households in Disadvantaged Communities, the Disadvantaged Communities Single-family Solar Home program provides $3/W toward solar installation — potentially $24,000+ for a qualifying 8 kW system. This is one of the most generous low-income solar programs in the country.

Property Tax Exemption (AB 1470): California exempts 100% of the assessed value added by solar installations through 2027. A $35,000 solar system that increases home value by $30,000 avoids approximately $375/year in increased property taxes at a 1.25% effective rate — worth $5,250 over 14 years.

No Sales Tax Exemption: California does NOT exempt solar equipment from its 7.25% base sales tax (plus district taxes up to 10.75% in some areas). On $42,000 in equipment and labor, expect $3,045–$4,515 in sales tax — a meaningful cost disadvantage vs. Nevada.

California Energy Community 40% ITC Zones

Several California areas qualify for the 40% Energy Community ITC bonus:

• Inland Empire coal transition areas: Parts of San Bernardino County near closed coal infrastructure
• Central Valley oil and gas communities: Kern County (Bakersfield area), Kings County, and Tulare County census tracts
• Bay Area legacy industrial: Select tracts in Contra Costa and Solano counties

Use the IRS Energy Community eligibility mapper at energycommunities.gov to check your specific address.

California Payback Examples (2026)

Los Angeles homeowner, SCE territory, NEM 3.0, with battery:

• 9 kW system + Powerwall 3: $38,500 installed
• 30% ITC: −$11,550; Net cost: $26,950
• Annual savings (92% self-consumption, SCE TOU-D rate): ~$3,200/year
• Payback: 8.4 years; 25-year net savings: ~$53,000

San Francisco homeowner, PG&E territory, NEM 3.0, no battery:

• 8 kW system, no storage: $27,000 installed
• 30% ITC: −$8,100; Net cost: $18,900
• Annual savings (low self-consumption, high TOU export mismatch): ~$1,400/year
• Payback: 13.5 years; 25-year net savings: ~$16,000

The battery difference in California is stark: a battery system in LA saves $37,000 more over 25 years than a no-battery system in San Francisco, despite a higher upfront cost.

---

Texas: The #2 Market — No State Mandate, Utility-by-Utility Reality

Texas is simultaneously one of the easiest and most complex states to evaluate for solar. Easy because it's sunny (4.8–5.5 PSH/day), has no state income tax (so the ITC is the whole federal story), and has a complete property tax exemption. Complex because Texas has no statewide net metering mandate — each electric utility sets its own solar export compensation policy.

Texas Net Metering: Your Utility Determines Your Payback

Unlike California (one state net metering policy from the CPUC) or Nevada (one statutory policy from the Legislature), Texas solar economics depend entirely on which utility you're in:

Texas Utility	Territory	Solar Export Policy	Export Rate
Austin Energy	Austin area	Retail-rate credit (PVFIT)	$0.099/kWh (2026)
CPS Energy	San Antonio	Value of Solar Tariff	$0.029/kWh (2026)
Oncor	Dallas/Fort Worth/Midland	Varies by retail provider; some offer buyback	$0.01–$0.05/kWh
AEP Texas	West Texas/Corpus Christi	Limited buyback programs	Varies
Entergy Texas	Southeast Texas/Beaumont	Net metering program	Retail rate for many customers

Austin Energy (PVFIT — Value of Solar): Austin has one of the best utility solar programs in Texas. The Permanent Value of Solar rate ($0.099/kWh in 2026) is lower than retail ($0.12–$0.13/kWh) but stable, predictable, and applies to all produced power (not just exported), similar to a performance-based incentive.

CPS Energy (San Antonio): The Value of Solar Tariff at $0.029/kWh is the least favorable in the major Texas markets — only a fraction of the $0.13–$0.14/kWh retail rate. San Antonio buyers should design for maximum self-consumption rather than expecting export revenue.

Oncor territory (Dallas/Fort Worth): Oncor is a distribution utility — you choose a retail electricity provider (REP). Some REPs offer solar buyback programs; others do not. Shop REPs specifically for solar buyback rate before installing. The best DFW options through savvy REP selection can yield $0.10–$0.12/kWh export credit.

The Texas battery calculus: Even in the most favorable Texas utility territories, pairing solar with battery storage improves economics by enabling peak-rate avoidance. But the bigger Texas battery argument is grid resilience: Winter Storm Uri (February 2021) left 4.5 million Texas households without power for up to a week during life-threatening cold. Battery storage systems kept homes heated, lit, and operational throughout the event.

Texas Incentives

100% Property Tax Exemption (Texas Tax Code § 11.27): Solar panel systems are fully exempt from property tax assessment on added home value. For a 10 kW system that adds $25,000 to assessed value in a Dallas County at 2.1% millage, this saves $525/year — $13,125 over a 25-year system life.

No Sales Tax Exemption: Texas does not exempt solar equipment from state sales tax (6.25% state rate plus local rates up to 8.25%). On a $28,000 installed system, expect $1,750–$2,310 in sales tax — a meaningful upfront cost not found in Nevada.

Energy Community 40% ITC: Multiple Texas counties qualify for the 40% bonus ITC:

• Permian Basin oil and gas: Midland, Ector, Andrews, and adjacent counties
• East Texas coal transition: Rusk, Panola, and Harrison counties (formerly home to major lignite coal operations)
• Gulf Coast petrochemical: Portions of Jefferson, Orange, and Chambers counties

Texas buyers in Energy Community zones can claim 40% ITC instead of 30% — saving an additional $2,800–$4,200 on a typical 10 kW system.

Utility Rebate Programs:

• Austin Energy: Rebates of $2,500 for solar systems up to 10 kW (funded when available)
• CPS Energy: $2,500 rebate for residential solar customers (varies by program funding)
• Green Mountain Energy: Offers Pollution Free® plans that integrate with solar buyback

Texas Payback Examples (2026)

Austin homeowner, Austin Energy PVFIT, 30% ITC:

• 9 kW system: $26,000 installed
• 30% ITC: −$7,800; Austin Energy rebate: −$2,500; Net cost: $15,700
• Annual savings ($0.099/kWh PVFIT on production + reduced bill): ~$1,450/year
• Payback: 10.8 years; 25-year net savings: ~$20,000

Dallas homeowner, Oncor, solar buyback REP, 30% ITC:

• 9 kW system: $25,000 installed
• 30% ITC: −$7,500; Net cost: $17,500
• Annual savings (optimized solar buyback REP, ~$0.10/kWh export): ~$1,250/year
• Payback: 14 years; 25-year net savings: ~$14,000

Houston homeowner, CPS territory equivalent or Entergy, 40% Energy Community ITC:

• 9 kW system in Energy Community area: $25,000 installed
• 40% ITC: −$10,000; Net cost: $15,000
• Annual savings (retail offset, moderate export): ~$1,150/year
• Payback: 13 years; 25-year net savings: ~$13,750

---

Nevada: The Policy Comeback Story — Now One of the West's Best Solar Markets

Nevada's solar story is a cautionary tale with a happy ending. In 2015, the Nevada Public Utilities Commission slashed the net metering rate and added a $17.90/month fixed fee for solar customers — making rooftop solar economically nonviable almost overnight. SolarCity, Vivint Solar, and Sunrun all exited the state within weeks, destroying thousands of jobs and stranding thousands of existing solar customers.

In 2017, Nevada passed AB 405 — restoring retail-rate net metering as a statutory right rather than a regulatory policy. This distinction matters: because AB 405 is law (not just a PUC ruling), rolling back NEM requires a legislative vote, not just a commission decision. This makes Nevada's net metering significantly more stable than California's (where NEM 3.0 was a PUC decision, not a legislative one).

Nevada Net Metering: AB 405 and Why It Matters

Under AB 405 (codified at NRS 704.766–704.775):

• Residential solar customers receive full retail-rate credit for exported power
• NV Energy (the dominant utility) must offer net metering to all qualifying customers
• Monthly billing is standard; credits roll forward to offset future bills
• This is explicitly different from California's export credit at $0.03–$0.08/kWh — Nevada pays $0.12–$0.15/kWh for the same exported kilowatt

The stability implication: If NV Energy or the PUC wanted to reduce the export rate, they would need the Legislature to amend NRS 704.766. That's a political process vs. a commission vote — substantially harder and more transparent. Nevada buyers who sign contracts today can reasonably expect their export rate to hold for 25 years in a way California NEM 3.0 buyers cannot.

Nevada's Full Incentive Stack (2026)

Federal 30% ITC: Standard across all three sun-belt states. Nevada's lower installed costs ($2.80–$3.10/W) vs. California ($3.20–$3.90/W) mean a slightly smaller ITC dollar amount — but lower upfront cost offsets this.

Property Tax Exemption (NRS 361.079): Nevada provides a 100% property tax exemption for residential solar installations — similar to California and Texas. At Clark County's effective rate of approximately 0.72%, a $20,000 increase in home value from a 9 kW system saves about $144/year, or $3,600 over 25 years.

Sales Tax Exemption (NRS 374.357): Nevada exempts solar energy systems from state sales tax — a meaningful advantage over California and Texas, which offer no sales tax exemption. On a $26,000 installed system, Nevada's 8.375% (Las Vegas combined rate) exemption saves approximately $2,178. This is a permanent, day-one cost advantage.

No State Income Tax: Nevada has no state income tax, so there's no state solar tax credit — but also no alternative minimum tax interaction, no state tax recapture risk, and no state tax basis complications.

Energy Community 40% ITC Zones: Select Nevada counties qualify:

• Elko County and parts of Lander County (historical gold/copper mining communities)
• Humboldt County census tracts
• Check energycommunities.gov for specific address verification

Nevada Payback Examples (2026)

Las Vegas homeowner, NV Energy, AB 405 net metering, 30% ITC:

• 9 kW system: $26,100 installed ($2.90/W)
• 30% ITC: −$7,830; Sales tax savings (included): approximately $2,178 already reflected
• Net cost: $18,270
• Annual savings: 13,800 kWh production × $0.135/kWh NV Energy rate = $1,863/year
• Payback: 9.8 years; 25-year net savings: approximately $28,000

Reno homeowner, NV Energy, AB 405 net metering, 30% ITC:

• 9 kW system: $25,200 installed ($2.80/W)
• 30% ITC: −$7,560; Net cost: $17,640
• Annual savings: 13,050 kWh production × $0.132/kWh = $1,723/year
• Payback: 10.2 years; 25-year net savings: approximately $25,400

Elko County homeowner, Energy Community 40% ITC:

• 9 kW system: $25,200 installed
• 40% ITC: −$10,080; Net cost: $15,120
• Annual savings: $1,620/year (5.2 PSH/day, $0.128/kWh)
• Payback: 9.3 years; 25-year net savings: approximately $25,400

---

Net Metering Policy Comparison: The Most Important Differentiator

Net metering policy is the single most important variable in comparing these three states — more impactful than sunshine, more stable than electricity rates, and the key driver of whether battery storage is essential or optional.

Policy Dimension	California	Texas	Nevada
Export rate	Avoided cost $0.03–$0.08/kWh (NEM 3.0)	$0.029–$0.13/kWh (utility-dependent)	Full retail $0.12–$0.15/kWh (AB 405)
Policy basis	PUC regulation (can be changed by commission)	No state mandate; utility discretion	State statute (requires Legislature to change)
Battery imperative?	Yes (without battery, export value too low)	Depends on utility (CPS = yes; Austin Energy = less urgent)	Optional (full retail NEM means good ROI without battery)
Policy stability	Moderate — NEM 3.0 was PUC decision; 3.0 buyers already accepted rate cut	Low — no state mandate; utilities can change programs	High — AB 405 statutory protection; legislative change required
Year-end surplus handling	Avoided cost payment (most surplus is lost)	Varies by utility	Roll-forward (most utilities)

The policy stability ranking: Nevada > Texas (Austin Energy) ≈ Texas (Entergy) > California NEM 2.0 grandfathered > Texas (Oncor) ≈ Texas (CPS) > California NEM 3.0

---

Battery Storage in Sun Belt States: When You Need It

Battery storage economics differ significantly across the three states:

California (battery essential):

• Without battery: Solar exports during midday at $0.03–$0.08/kWh; you buy evening power at $0.60/kWh (TOU peak)
• With battery: Store midday production, discharge during peak — avoiding $0.60/kWh purchases
• Battery payback in CA: 8–12 years (faster in SCE/SDG&E territory with high TOU peaks)
• 30% ITC applies to battery — reduces net cost by $2,400–$3,450 on a 13.5 kWh system

Texas (battery for resilience first, economics second):

• Winter Storm Uri baseline: 4.5 million homes without power for up to 7 days in February 2021
• Battery provides reliable backup against ERCOT grid failures — which occur in heat waves (August 2023) and winter storms
• In CPS Energy territory: Battery helps avoid their high demand charges during summer peak hours
• Battery payback in TX: 10–15 years on economics alone; buyers often value resilience separately

Nevada (battery optional but increasingly popular):

• AB 405 full retail export credit means solar without battery already has strong 9–12 year payback
• Battery adds resilience and potential VPP income ($150–$400/year)
• CA NEM 3.0 refugees moving to Nevada sometimes still add batteries from habit — not required
• Battery payback in NV: 11–15 years on economics alone (reasonable but longer than CA)

---

Energy Community 40% ITC: Sun Belt Opportunities

The Energy Community 40% ITC bonus (10 percentage points above the standard 30%) applies to homes and businesses in census tracts tied to fossil fuel employment history.

California Energy Community zones:

• Kern County (Bakersfield) — oil and gas extraction communities
• Central Valley agricultural/industrial census tracts
• Bay Area legacy industrial zones in Contra Costa County

Texas Energy Community zones:

• Permian Basin (Midland, Ector, Andrews counties) — oil and gas
• East Texas lignite coal counties (Rusk, Panola, Harrison)
• Gulf Coast petrochemical communities (Jefferson, Orange counties)
• Nota bene: Midland homeowners qualify for 40% ITC on what is already one of the sunniest (5.5 PSH/day) and most affordable Texas installer markets

Nevada Energy Community zones:

• Elko, Lander, Humboldt, and select Churchill County census tracts (gold/copper mining)

Financial impact: The 10 percentage point bonus means an additional $2,800–$4,200 in ITC on a $28,000–$42,000 system. Midland TX buyers, Kern County CA buyers, and Elko NV buyers who overlook their Energy Community status leave a significant sum unclaimed.

---

Ranked Recommendation: Which Sun Belt State Has the Best Solar ROI?

1. Nevada — Best overall economics for most buyers

• Full retail net metering (statutory protection via AB 405)
• Both property and sales tax exemptions
• 9–12 year standard payback
• Policy stability (legislative change required to reduce NEM)
• Battery optional (good ROI without it)
• Best for: Budget-conscious buyers who want strong returns without battery; buyers who value policy stability

2. California — Best for high-rate, battery-ready buyers

• Highest electricity rates in the country ($0.30–$0.40/kWh) create outsized savings when you self-consume
• SGIP battery rebate (especially valuable for income-qualified buyers)
• 9–13 year payback with battery; 13–16 without
• Property tax exemption; no sales tax exemption
• Best for: Homeowners ready to add battery storage; high-rate urban areas (LA, San Diego); income-qualified buyers accessing SGIP Equity tier
• Worst for: Buyers who want a simple panel-only installation with good economics

3. Texas (market-dependent)

• Austin Energy buyers: Competitive economics, 10–12 year payback, rebate available → comparable to Nevada
• CPS Energy buyers: Challenging export economics, battery essential → 12–16 year payback without VoS optimization
• Oncor/Dallas buyers: Depends entirely on REP selection → 11–15 year payback range
• Best for: Austin homeowners (PVFIT + rebate); buyers with significant battery resilience interest; Energy Community buyers in Permian Basin; buyers prioritizing grid independence after Winter Storm Uri
• Worst for: CPS Energy territory buyers who want maximum export credits without battery

---

What Every Sun Belt Buyer Should Do Before Signing a Contract

Regardless of which state you're in, these actions are the same:

1. Verify Energy Community status — check energycommunities.gov with your exact address. A 40% ITC vs. 30% is a $2,800–$4,200 difference on a typical system.

2. Know your net metering policy before you get quotes — in Texas especially, ask every installer "what REP are you recommending and what buyback rate?" before comparing bids. In Nevada, confirm the installer is aware of AB 405 statutory protection. In California, confirm they're designing for NEM 3.0 self-consumption (not NEM 2.0 export assumptions).

3. Get 3+ competing quotes — the solar installer market in all three states is mature and competitive. Quotes for the same system can vary by $3,000–$8,000 in the same city.

4. Use the Solar ROI Calculator — the Solar ROI Calculator pre-fills your state's electricity rate and peak sun hours to generate a personalized payback period estimate before you talk to any installer.

5. Run the Shade Loss Calculator — if you have any shading concerns, the Shade Loss Calculator quantifies production loss and determines whether MLPE (microinverters or power optimizers) is worth the premium for your specific shade pattern.

6. Plan for battery if you're in California — use the Solar Financing Calculator with the battery cost included from the start. The 30% ITC applies to battery; factoring it in from the beginning gives you the accurate true-net-cost picture.

---

Sun Belt vs. Other Regional Hubs: How They Compare

Region	Top States	Best Incentive	Net Metering Type	Solar Story
Sun Belt (this guide)	CA, TX, NV	SGIP battery (CA); Property exemption (TX); Sales exemption (NV)	Avoided cost / Utility varies / Retail statutory	High sun, divergent policy
Mountain West	NM, AZ, CO, UT, WY	NM 10% state credit + GRT exemption	Mix: retail, avoided-cost, demand charge (AZ SRP)	Best sun, most diverse incentives
Southeast	SC, NC, VA, FL, GA, TN	SC 25% state credit	Retail (SC, NC, VA, FL); Avoided cost (GA Power >10 kW, TVA)	Hurricane/storm resilience, southern sun
Pacific Northwest	OR, WA, ID, MT	OR RETC + ETO rebate	Retail (OR statutory); Retail (WA statutory); Avoided cost (ID)	Cloudy reputation belies real ROI

---

Frequently Asked Questions: Sun Belt Solar 2026

Which sun-belt state has the best solar incentives? Nevada has the cleanest, most buyer-friendly incentive picture: full retail net metering (statutory protection under AB 405), complete property and sales tax exemptions, and 5.3–5.8 peak sun hours. California offers the highest absolute dollar savings per kWh consumed (due to high rates), but requires battery storage to achieve good paybacks under NEM 3.0. Texas is the largest market but the most variable — Austin Energy buyers get strong economics comparable to Nevada, while CPS Energy buyers face challenging export rates.

Is solar worth it in California after NEM 3.0? Yes — but only with battery storage. Without a battery, California solar paybacks extend to 13–16 years under NEM 3.0 because export credits are too low ($0.03–$0.08/kWh) to compensate for midday surplus. With a battery (Powerwall 3, Enphase IQ 5P, or equivalent), California homeowners can optimize self-consumption, avoid TOU peak rates ($0.40–$0.60/kWh evenings), and achieve 9–12 year paybacks. The 30% ITC on battery cost and SGIP rebates (especially in the Equity tier for income-qualified buyers) meaningfully reduce the battery's net cost.

Does Texas have net metering for solar panels? Texas has no statewide net metering mandate. Each electric utility establishes its own solar export compensation program. Austin Energy's PVFIT pays $0.099/kWh; CPS Energy's Value of Solar pays $0.029/kWh; Oncor territory buyers must shop retail electricity providers (REPs) for solar buyback programs. Ask specifically about buyback rate when comparing installer bids — this single variable has the biggest impact on payback period in Texas.

How did Nevada's net metering policy change and is it stable now? In 2015, Nevada's PUC slashed export rates and added monthly fees, killing the solar market. In 2017, AB 405 restored retail-rate net metering as a statutory right (NRS 704.766). Because this is statute rather than regulation, changing it requires a vote of the Nevada Legislature — a significantly higher bar than the 2015 PUC vote. Nevada's net metering is considered among the most legally stable in the Sun Belt states.

What is the Energy Community solar tax credit bonus in Sun Belt states? The Energy Community 40% ITC bonus (10 percentage points above the standard 30%) applies in specific census tracts tied to fossil fuel employment. In California, these are primarily in Kern County (oil/gas), Central Valley industrial areas, and Bay Area legacy industrial zones. In Texas, they include Permian Basin counties (Midland, Ector), East Texas lignite coal counties (Rusk, Panola), and Gulf Coast petrochemical communities. In Nevada, they include Elko, Lander, and Humboldt county mining areas. Use the IRS Energy Community eligibility mapper to verify your specific address before signing any contract.

---

Next Steps for Sun Belt Solar Buyers

Whichever state you're in, the path to going solar is the same:

1. Assess your home for solar — Is My Home Solar-Ready? covers roof orientation, shade analysis, and electrical panel requirements
2. Estimate your ROI — Solar ROI Calculator (pre-fills state-specific rates and sun hours)
3. Check shade impact — Shade Loss Calculator (quantifies production loss and MLPE payback)
4. Design your system — Solar System Designer (generates component specs and Amazon product links)
5. Compare financing — Solar Financing Calculator (cash vs. loan vs. lease true 25-year cost)
6. Read your state's full guide: California | Texas | Nevada
7. Vet your installer — How to Choose a Solar Installer
8. Get 3+ competing quotes — How to Compare Solar Quotes

The Solar Energy for Beginners 2026 guide covers the full buying journey end-to-end if you're just starting your research.